Electronic Voting and What Should be Done Essay -- essays research pap

Theres been a lot of talk about this new computer arrangement that casts choice votes. Ideally, using electronic equipment has many advantages but there are disadvantages hiding in the cave ready to attack. Weve all seen electronic equipment often manoeuver as expected but more meaning(a)ly, its not uncommon for electronic equipment to fail and when this sort of concept is applied to voting, miscounting is simply unacceptable. I deem the scoop way to solve this type problem is to try to make the voting machines work without fail but to never assume it wont fail. As weve seen from the arrogance of the engineers of the Titanic or from the 2004 New York Yankees, just because it looks and sounds workable, we should never assume these machines will do what it should. By this, I dont mean the dodge should fail completely but we should design the system to constantly self-check itself to insure no errors have been made. In addition, the system should friendly so that at least at the user point-of-view, there should not be problems with confusion or misinterpretation. Overall, making an e-voting system work requires the engineer to consider the logical, defensive ( tribute against hacking) and personal standpoint of design and do so in a sensitive, introspective manner.First and foremost, the system should be ethical. What this government agency is the system should be created to an acceptable and mainstream protocol. Ethics means different things to different people but we cant satisfy all of these morals that people have all on cardinal system since some might contradict one another so we need to decide on what the majority would find acceptable. Right off the bat, its important to prevent hacker attacks because people want a fair election and not a tailored one. We go to vote to voice our opinion and not that of someone else. Secondly, its important to let the public know what these voting machines do and how theyre secured, letting the public know that t he e-voting companies care about their security and that these voting machines are engineered with exhaustive research on how to keep it secure. Lastly, the user interface, the user interface should be unbiased (it shouldnt look like the one candidate is better than the other). Another thing about the user interface is that it should be easy to understand as to not intimidate voters.I think there also should be the option t... ...oting systems should use tickets, or signatures that identify each voter uniquely and each vote should be logged with user token in memory so that the voter cant vote twice. Although, any security measure isnt entirely secure from clever hackers, memory security very strict would prevent many attempts.Once youve voted from an e-voting machine and somehow passed all the security that was involved I think it would be beguile to give the user a receipt showing exactly what was stored in memory because like I said early, we should never assume everything wi ll work and if the voter can verify by eye what was stored then this would allow corrections if needed. In addition this type of system could be used for clear recounts or to check user errors which would probably be 90% of all the complaints given that the programming was planned properly. Yes, it may be possible for deceiving information to be printed out, making the vote look correct but if all the aforementioned methods of checking, security, and logging and provided that everything was executed well, an electronic problem to this point should be very rare. Comparatively, this should be no more secure than paper ballots.